But that's just my resume. My eclectic profile of vocations is only one of the ways in which I am uniquely me.
Here I chronicle my personal and professional goals and my efforts to achieve them. Occasionally I fail. Mostly, I take daily baby steps toward all my long-term goals. Much like the stories I pen, the songs I compose, and the business I run, I am always a work in progress.
Will add that there are authors who are copyrighted? because they have published novels, at least on Amazon if not other places, where chunks or more have been written with AI.
I'm sure as some of those lawsuits are decided we will learn more about this whole thing.
Generally speaking, using AI for research purposes is not considered copyright infringement. Using AI output in the creative work itself can be considered infringement, depending on the AI model used and the data it was trained on. Pretty much every major AI model is currently defending against multiple active, ongoing lawsuits over copyright infringement for training their model on other people's intellectual property without permission.
In your specific case (and with the caveat that this is not legal advice), I personally think it's relatively low risk because common phrasing is generally not copyrightable. In order for someone to have a legitimate claim of copyright infringement, they first have to demonstrate that they own the material in question... and I don't know that anyone can claim to own generic, nonspecific, widely-used slang or idioms.
A few years ago I read a novel - An Instance Of The Fingerpost - which, on the surface, was a historical whodunnit told through the eyes of four unreliable narrators. It was in four sections, each written from the point of view of one of the narrators, and it was only when you got to the final section that you realised that, not only was the last narrator actually pretty damn reliable, but there had been something "other" going on the whole time and the murder that had appeared to be the central event was in fact a bit of a side-show.
I did not see it coming, and when I realised when it was all about, I was initially a bit annoyed by it. But, on reflection, it was very well done and didn't telegraph the ending it any way. So it can be done, but it'll take a lot of hard work to do it well, especially if you're making frequent POV switches.
I've never tried writing anything from more than two perspectives - and that only rarely. Your situation, though, reminds me of the 2008 political action thriller Vantage Point. Parts of the action are revealed from the vantage point of Forest Whitaker's character, who was videotaping the event with his hand-held camcorder. Interesting, to say the least.
I recently revisited a Dear Me (2018) letter, and it made me glad I've come so far in my life. I'm really glad you have the proper diagnosis and that you're finding yourself doing the things that make you happy. Overachievers and scope creepers unite!
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.22 seconds at 5:45pm on Dec 17, 2025 via server WEBX1.