%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 As the first blog entry got exhausted. My second book |
| Evolution of Love Part 2 |
| On June 1, 2018, Ross Edgley walked into the ocean at Margate, England, with a simple but insane plan: swim around the entire island of Great Britain without touching land. Not once. The plan sounded impossible because it was. No human had ever done it. Several had tried and failed. The coastline stretched 1,780 miles through some of the world's most dangerous waters—past shipping lanes carrying massive cargo vessels, through tidal currents that could sweep swimmers miles off course, around rocky headlands where waves smashed with enough force to kill. Edgley, a 32-year-old athlete and sports scientist, understood the mathematics of what he was attempting. Swimming six to eight hours daily in open ocean. Sleeping on a support boat but never setting foot on solid ground. Eating and drinking while treading water. Doing this for four to five months straight while his body slowly broke down from constant saltwater exposure and relentless physical demands. He dove in anyway. The first day felt manageable. Then the first week. Edgley swam in two shifts daily—morning and afternoon sessions totaling six to eight hours in the water. His support boat, Hecate, followed nearby with his crew managing navigation, safety, and logistics. Between swims, Edgley would climb aboard to eat massive meals (10,000 to 15,000 calories daily), sleep, and monitor his deteriorating physical condition. The deterioration began almost immediately. Saltwater is corrosive. Human bodies aren't designed for continuous immersion in it. Within days, Edgley's skin began breaking down. Constant chafing from wetsuit and movement created raw wounds that couldn't heal because they never dried. His hands swelled grotesquely from osmotic pressure, looking like inflated rubber gloves. But the worst damage was happening in his mouth. The constant exposure to salt water—drinking accidentally, breathing spray, hours with face partially submerged—began destroying his tongue. The soft tissue started disintegrating. Salt crystals formed in the wounds. Speaking became painful. Eating became agony. By week three, portions of his tongue had essentially eroded away. Edgley's support team consulted doctors. The medical advice was unanimous: stop. Let the tongue heal. The damage was severe and could become permanent. Continuing seemed medically insane. Edgley kept swimming. He adapted by eating soft foods, rinsing constantly with fresh water, and accepting that pain would be his constant companion. He later said the tongue damage was excruciating but stopping never seriously entered his mind. The goal was bigger than temporary suffering. As summer progressed, new challenges emerged. Jellyfish season arrived. Edgley swam through swarms of them, collecting stings across his face, neck, and exposed skin. Each sting burned. Hundreds of stings burned continuously. There was no way to avoid them—they were simply part of the ecosystem he was moving through. Then came the storms. British waters are notoriously temperamental. Summer storms rolled through with regularity, bringing massive swells, driving rain, and dangerous currents. During storms, Edgley had two choices: stay on the boat and lose days of progress, or swim through conditions that could kill him. He usually swam. His crew watched from the boat as Edgley disappeared into troughs between six-foot swells, then reappeared on the crests. Rain hammered him. Wind drove waves over his head. Visibility dropped to meters. But he kept his stroke rhythm, kept his navigation bearings, kept moving forward. The mental challenge exceeded the physical. Endurance athletes talk about "the pain cave"—the psychological space where your body is screaming to stop but your mind must override every survival instinct to continue. Edgley lived in the pain cave for 157 consecutive days. Boredom became torture. Swimming is repetitive. Stroke after stroke after stroke, staring at gray water, for six to eight hours daily, for months. No music. No distraction. Just you, the ocean, and your thoughts. Edgley had trained for this specifically—practicing meditation, visualization, and mental techniques to manage the monotony. He broke the journey into tiny goals. Not "swim around Britain" but "swim to that buoy." Then "swim to that headland." Then "swim for one more hour." Breaking impossible into manageable kept him moving when the full scope would have been psychologically crushing. His body was consuming itself. Despite eating three to four times normal caloric intake, Edgley lost significant weight. His muscles were breaking down from constant use. His immune system was compromised from sleep deprivation and stress. He developed infections. His joints ached constantly. Medical professionals monitoring his condition warned that he was pushing into territory where permanent damage became likely. His body might not fully recover from this level of sustained trauma. Edgley kept swimming. Around the two-month mark, Edgley reached Scotland's northern coast—some of the most dangerous waters in his route. The Pentland Firth, between mainland Scotland and the Orkney Islands, is notorious. Tidal currents there can reach 12 knots—faster than Olympic swimmers can swim. Get the timing wrong and the ocean simply pushes you backward regardless of effort. Edgley's team calculated tide windows carefully. They had narrow time slots when currents would be manageable. Miss the window and they'd lose days waiting for the next opportunity. The pressure was enormous—months of effort could be wasted by a single navigation error. They threaded the needle perfectly. Edgley swam through the Pentland Firth during a favorable tide window, making progress that should have been impossible. It was calculated risk backed by preparation, but success still required executing perfectly while exhausted and damaged. As autumn approached, the water temperature dropped. What had been uncomfortably cold became legitimately dangerous. Hypothermia risk increased dramatically. Edgley's wetsuit provided some protection, but hours of immersion in 50-degree water extracts heat faster than the human body can generate it. He began shivering uncontrollably during swims. His speech slurred from cold when he climbed onto the support boat. His core temperature dropped into dangerous zones. The crew monitored him constantly for signs of severe hypothermia—confusion, loss of coordination, unconsciousness. Several times, they came close to pulling him out forcibly. But Edgley would recover enough to continue, then dive back in for the next session. By October, he had been in the water for 130 days. Britain's southwestern coast lay ahead—the home stretch. But "home stretch" is relative when you're swimming dozens of miles daily through autumn storms around rocky coastlines notorious for shipwrecks. Edgley's tongue had partially healed, then damaged again, then partially healed again in endless cycle. His body had adapted in remarkable ways—his skin had thickened significantly, his cold tolerance had increased, his mental resilience had been forged into something almost inhuman. But he was also reaching his limits. Sleep deprivation, constant pain, relentless cold, and months of psychological pressure were accumulating into a debt that couldn't be repaid while still swimming. His crew watched him carefully for signs he was approaching breakdown. The final stretch along England's southern coast brought new dangers: massive shipping traffic. The English Channel is one of the busiest shipping lanes on Earth. Cargo vessels, tankers, ferries—hundreds of ships daily moving through waters where Edgley was swimming. Each vessel represented a potential collision that could kill him instantly. His support boat maintained constant vigilance, monitoring marine traffic and positioning to make Edgley visible to commercial shipping. Close calls happened. Massive vessels passing near enough that their wake created dangerous swells. The psychological stress of swimming while tankers passed overhead added new layer of tension. On November 4, 2018—157 days after starting—Ross Edgley completed the final miles approaching Margate, where he had begun. Crowds gathered on the beach. Media boats surrounded him. The man who had been alone with ocean for five months was suddenly swimming through a celebration. When he finally touched the beach—the first land contact in 157 days—his legs barely supported him. Muscle had atrophied. Balance was compromised. Walking felt foreign after so long in the water. He collapsed on the sand, overwhelmed, exhausted, triumphant. He had swum 1,780 miles. 2,864 kilometers. Around the entire island of Great Britain without touching land until the finish. First person in history to do it. The medical examination afterward revealed extraordinary damage. His tongue showed permanent scarring. His skin had thickened dramatically. He had lost significant muscle mass despite massive caloric intake. Joint damage from repetitive motion would require months of recovery. His immune system was compromised. But he had proven something profound: the human body, when properly conditioned and supported, can endure far more than medical science believed possible. Edgley's achievement expanded understanding of human endurance limits. His preparation had been meticulous. Years of cold-water training. Practicing eating while swimming. Sleep deprivation drills. Psychological conditioning. Learning to override pain signals. Every detail had been considered, trained, prepared. But preparation alone wouldn't have been sufficient. The real achievement was the daily choice—for 157 consecutive days—to get back in the water despite pain, despite damage, despite every rational reason to stop. That's the part that makes Ross Edgley's swim more than just a record. It's a demonstration of human will overcoming human limitation. Of mind conquering the body's desperate pleas to quit. Of setting an impossible goal and refusing to accept the rational arguments for why it can't be done. Edgley's swim attracted global media attention, raised significant money for ocean conservation, and inspired thousands to reconsider their own limits. But perhaps more importantly, it forced revision of what we believe humans can endure. Medical textbooks said the damage he sustained should have forced him to stop. Sports science said the caloric demands couldn't be sustained. Marine experts said the tides and shipping traffic made it too dangerous. Previous failed attempts said it was impossible. Ross Edgley said otherwise. He proved it stroke by stroke, mile by mile, day by day, for 157 days straight, while his tongue disintegrated and storms tried to drown him and his body consumed itself from the inside. He never touched land. He never quit. He finished. Sometimes the most important discoveries about human capability come not from laboratories but from individuals willing to push themselves beyond every reasonable limit to see what's actually possible. Ross Edgley swam around Britain to find out. The answer was: more than anyone thought. |
| She discovered a virus that revolutionized genetics and invented a technique still used in every biology lab. Her husband won the Nobel Prize for their work. She got nothing. Esther Lederberg was born on December 18, 1922, in the Bronx, New York, into a world just beginning to acknowledge that women could contribute to science—though rarely on equal terms. She showed early brilliance in biology and earned her PhD in genetics from the University of Wisconsin in 1950, joining the tiny percentage of women with doctorates in the sciences. That same year, she was already married to Joshua Lederberg, a rising star in bacterial genetics whom she'd married in 1946. They worked together at the University of Wisconsin, then moved to Stanford University where Joshua secured a faculty position. Esther? She was given the title of "research associate"—a lower-status position despite equivalent or superior expertise. It was a pattern that would define her career: doing groundbreaking work while receiving marginal institutional recognition. In 1951, while working in what was technically Joshua's laboratory (though she ran much of the research), Esther made an extraordinary discovery: lambda phage (bacteriophage λ), a virus that infects bacteria. This wasn't just identifying another microorganism. Lambda phage became one of the most important tools in molecular biology, helping scientists understand: How genes turn on and off (gene regulation) How genetic material recombines How viruses integrate into host genomes The fundamental mechanisms of genetic control Lambda phage became the model organism for studying lysogeny (how viruses can lie dormant in bacterial DNA) and genetic switches. It was foundational to the emerging field of molecular genetics and would later become crucial for genetic engineering, recombinant DNA technology, and understanding cancer-causing viruses. It was Nobel Prize-level work. Esther made the discovery. But her name was often relegated to acknowledgments rather than authorship. Then in 1952, Esther developed another revolutionary technique: replica plating. Before her method, identifying bacterial mutants with specific traits was painstakingly slow, often impossible. Scientists had to test individual colonies one by one, destroying them in the process. Esther's replica plating technique was elegantly simple but transformative: using a velvet-covered block, she could transfer bacterial colonies from one Petri dish to multiple other dishes in the exact same spatial arrangement—like making copies while preserving the original. This meant scientists could: Test the same bacterial colonies under different conditions Identify mutants with specific resistance or growth patterns Map bacterial genetics systematically Study antibiotic resistance mechanisms The technique became standard practice in every microbiology lab worldwide. It's still used today, fundamentally unchanged from Esther's original method. It revolutionized bacterial genetics research and opened the door to understanding antibiotic resistance, genetic mapping, and mutation studies. Again, this was Nobel Prize-worthy work. And again, credit became complicated. The replica plating paper was published with both Esther and Joshua as authors, but over time, the technique became associated primarily with Joshua's name. Esther's role was minimized in historical accounts, textbooks, and even scientific citations. She also discovered the F plasmid (fertility factor) in E. coli bacteria—another foundational discovery in bacterial genetics that explained how bacteria transfer genetic material during conjugation. Three major discoveries. All foundational to modern molecular biology. All made or co-made by Esther Lederberg. In 1958, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded for discoveries in bacterial genetics. The recipients were: George Beadle (for work on genetic control of biochemical reactions) Edward Tatum (for the same work with Beadle) Joshua Lederberg (for discoveries concerning genetic recombination and bacterial genetics) Esther Lederberg was not included. The Nobel Committee awarded Joshua for work in bacterial genetics—the exact field where Esther had made multiple groundbreaking discoveries, often working alongside or ahead of him. Lambda phage? Esther's discovery. Replica plating? Esther's invention. F plasmid? Esther's finding. But only Joshua's name appeared on the Nobel Prize. This wasn't an oversight. It was a pattern. Throughout her career, Esther's contributions were systematically minimized: Her name was left off papers where she'd done primary research Her ideas were presented as part of Joshua's body of work She was given lower-status positions (research associate, assistant professor) while Joshua rose to full professor When colleagues praised their work, they defaulted to crediting Joshua Historical accounts of bacterial genetics discoveries often omitted her entirely Meanwhile, Esther continued doing meticulous laboratory work, mentoring young scientists, and making discoveries that others would build careers upon. In 1966, Esther and Joshua divorced. The marriage had been professionally productive but personally difficult, and the power imbalance—where his career was prioritized while hers was treated as supplementary—had taken its toll. After the divorce, Esther's career faced even more difficulties. She struggled to secure adequate funding for her research. She held positions at Stanford's Department of Medical Microbiology but never achieved the institutional standing her contributions deserved. She continued working, teaching, and mentoring—influencing a generation of microbiologists who learned from her expertise even when the broader scientific community failed to properly credit her. Esther Lederberg died on November 11, 2006, at age 83. In her later years, some recognition came: awards from scientific societies, acknowledgment in histories of molecular biology that were finally being written with attention to overlooked women scientists. But she never received the Nobel Prize. She never got the institutional positions commensurate with her discoveries. She never received the widespread recognition that Joshua enjoyed for work they'd done together—or that she'd done alone. Today, historians of science recognize the injustice. Lambda phage, replica plating, and the F plasmid are acknowledged as Esther's contributions. Textbooks are slowly being corrected. Her name is being restored to the discoveries that were always hers. But for decades, her brilliance was hidden in her husband's shadow—not because her work was inferior, but because the system was designed to credit men and marginalize women, especially when those women were married to prominent male scientists. Esther Lederberg's story is a case study in how women's scientific contributions are erased: Her discoveries were attributed to her husband. Her techniques were taught without her name. Her Nobel Prize-worthy work was recognized only when a man's name was attached. And this wasn't unique to Esther. It's the same pattern as Rosalind Franklin (DNA structure credit to Watson and Crick), Marietta Blau (particle physics techniques credited to Cecil Powell), countless others. The system wasn't just passively failing to recognize women. It was actively transferring their credit to men. Today, every time a biology student uses replica plating in a lab, they're using Esther Lederberg's technique—though many don't know her name. Every time researchers work with lambda phage, they're using Esther Lederberg's discovery—though textbooks often minimize her role. Every breakthrough in genetic engineering that built on her foundational work carries her uncredited fingerprints. Esther Lederberg was a quiet revolutionary—not because she wanted to be quiet, but because the scientific establishment worked tirelessly to silence her, even while building entire fields on her discoveries. Her legacy is not just in the science she created. It's in the pattern she exposes: how easily brilliance can be stolen when institutions decide whose name deserves to be remembered. She discovered a virus that changed genetics. She invented a technique used in every biology lab for 70+ years. She mapped bacterial sexuality and genetic transfer. And her husband won the Nobel Prize. That's not oversight. That's theft. Systemic, institutional, sanctioned theft of credit, recognition, and career advancement. Remember Esther Lederberg. Not as inspiration, but as evidence—that women's contributions to science are constantly at risk of erasure, even when they're foundational, even when they're revolutionary, even when they're Nobel Prize-worthy. And that the only way to prevent erasure is to actively, constantly, deliberately document, credit, and celebrate women's work—before history gets written by the men who benefited from stealing it. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
Puzzle Hub
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
