%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
House of Dynamite and the President Late this month the movie “House of Dynamite” came out in theaters. One of the themes, founded in reality is the short time frame a president has to make a decision to launch nuclear weapons in the event of an actual or suspected attack on the United States. The public literature from experts in this area suggests time frames from ten to thirty minutes. A decision that is made by a president without any checks and balances, that could nearly end life on the planet. This week President Trump stated, “because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis.” Department of War and nuclear weapons testing, sounds ominous. Experts and advisers were shocked, dismayed, and confused. Nuclear testing involving detonation of devices has not happened in 30 years, what is he thinking? What do you think about President Trump having his finger on the button? Go to the political taboo forum "Trumps Finger on the Nuclear Button"  by Damon Nomad  and give your views. |
ATTENTION HORROR WRITERS LOOKING FOR A REAL CHALLENGE According to the Horror Tree, an anthology based on the setting of the Shining is in the works. Apparently, there will be an open call soon, capped at 500 submissions and accepting one story, the others are filled by invited writers. Paying $2000 ahead of royalties according to the article. This is out of my league, but someone on WDC might be game. From the Horror Tree: Screenwriter Jamie Flanagan is putting together an anthology based on the infamous hotel from Stephen King’s ‘The Shining’ and it already features work from: Michael Bailey, Chelsea Cain, Johnny Compton, Mike Flanagan, Christopher Golden, Justina Ireland, AI Jiang, Alma Katsu, Brian Keene, Daniel Kraus, Silvia Moreno-Garcia, Chuck Palahniuk, and more with Ellie Pritchett editing. Source https://www.horrortree.com/advance-notice-full-call-will-be-posted-when-availabl... |
THE EXCITING ROLLER COASTER RIDE OF TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING I have had a long string of rejections, and as usual, the good news seems to come in clusters. This week brought a new book launch. Today brought an email with an acceptance and contract offer to publish a new story in an upcoming anthology. This is one of those stories I stuck with through previous rejections and refined and tweaked it. In a twisted sort of way, the rejections make the acceptances more meaningful. WRITE! SUBMIT! REJECT! PUBLISH! REPEAT |
BOOK LAUNCH! BOOK LAUNCH! BOOK LAUNCH! A publisher just released a new anthology with my story, BONE STEW. It’s been a while since I have had a new one go out. Feel free to purchase and publish great online reviews of my story.
| ||||||
| If WDC is interested in upgrading the Authors in Print, it would be nice if it could go beyond six entries. |
ReplyDead Presidents and US Currency The decision to place a person's likeness on US currency, including coins, has been a decision treated with dignity and careful thought. The US Treasury is considering a one-dollar coin commemorating the 250th anniversary of independence (1776-2026) for next year. Of course, dead presidents were considered the front-runners. In 2016, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco confirmed that "a living person may not appear on U.S. currency." "To avoid the appearance of a monarchy, it was a long-standing tradition to only feature portraits of deceased individuals on currency and coin." (Emphasis added by me.) Front-runners amongst presidential historians are said to be Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan. Imagine their shock and awe, surely, when the US Treasury recently confirmed the proposed design of the new coin is, yes, of course, the current president. The reverse side of the coin is particularly fetching, the president's fist raised with words FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT. I wonder whose idea this was? I would direct any discussion and commentary to the forum "TABOO forum: politics" |
Amethyst SkellyBones Angel  - He's not kidding. It's not even the most disgusting thing the King Orange One has done this week. |
| Amethyst SkellyBones Angel - See news articles www.politico.com/news/2025/10/03/treasury-department-trump-dollar-coin-00593368 www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/10/03/donald-trump-commemorative-coin-legal/86504452007/ |
Perception is not Reality A common saying with a certain truth. I have been thinking about something over the last few days that has nagged at me off and on for years. It started with the suggestion from a professor decades ago that the pen he dropped onto the table top could pass through the table. There was a calculable probability; he was trying to force us to abandon our real-world perceptions as we took on the Schrödinger wave equation and quantum tunneling. You remember that an atom is made up of neutrons, protons, and electrons. You probably think of them as tiny billiard balls, very tiny particles. Tiny, but they don’t pass through solid objects. Yet they do pass through barriers; solid-state electronics relies on electrons “tunneling” through barriers. They don’t punch holes; they just appear on the other side. Without this nonsensical “reality,” your mobile phone and laptop would not be possible. The wave equation tells us that the neutron, proton, and electron are waves, not particles. With a position and speed (momentum) that are not precisely defined. The position is smeared out probabilistically; some of those positions are on the other side of a barrier. They are either particles or waves, right? No, it’s our intuition that is tricking us into believing that our observation and cognition of what we see in the macro world can be applied to the quantum world. Just as our intuition fails us on the grand scale of the universe, that time was not absolute when Einstein defined space-time and a new theory of gravity as curved space-time. These fuzzy areas of reality also provide opportunities for speculative fiction, especially science fiction, where you want the reader to suspend reality. For me, it’s frustrating to realize things so fundamental are so far from grasping. |
Dark Age of Science? It seems laughable to imagine that the vast majority of people believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. The sun, moon, and stars circling the Earth. Not so long ago, until Copernicus, Galileo, and finally Newton nailed it shut around 1700. Just a few hundred years ago. Another few hundred years from now, people will likely be laughing at "us" and Dark Matter and Dark Energy. If you aren’t aware, the term dark just means unknown. Unknown matter and energy that make up 95% of the universe. One hypothesized because of repeated observations of acceleration rates of universal expansion, and the other because of the rate at which galaxies rotate. Yes, our greatest and most brilliant minds understand 5% of what is out there. Now, they know a lot about that five percent, but still not so great. Not to mention the awkward world of quantum mechanics where gravity doesn't seem to exist. Welcome to the dark age of science. |
| In point of fact, the Greek astronomer Aristarchus of Samos in around 230BCE proposed a model of the universe with the sun at the center and the planets, including Earth, revolving around it. This was generally rejected at the time because of the lack of stellar parallax, unobservable without telescopy. In other words, the "best evidence" available at the time supported the Earth-centered model of Ptolemy. Also, Kepler and his three laws of planetary motion should be included in the list of people who nailed the heliocentric theory. The heliocentric model best explained those laws and was fundamental in Newton's later formulation of the laws of motion and his theory of gravity. A similar chain of connections, starting with Faraday and Michelson/Morley, leading to Maxwell, and culminating with Einstein's theory of general relativity show how more granular observations lead to fundamental revisions in physical models. But your basic point is correct. Our understanding of the universe *should* be based on "best evidence." But our evidence is becoming ever more granular. The Hubble Tension, for example seems to have been confirmed rather than resolved by recent observations from the James Webb Space Telescope. That, and other things it's seen, suggest that the current Lambda-CDM model may be incorrect. That model includes both dark energy and dark matter, which are inferred from observation but not yet actually "seen" (for example, in particle accelerators or in experiments that "should" have detected them). It's likely that observations will lead to advances in theory. This kind connection, connections similar to Faraday/Maxwell/Einstein and and Copernicus/Kepler/Gallileo/Newton, are at work today, via JWST among other data points. We're still at the Faraday stage. Sorry, more rambling...I'm getting old. |
Robert Waltz  - Excellent points. What's terrifying is that proven science, like vaccinations, are now under relentless attack from our own government. I just hope it doesn't take an epidemic killing millions to change course. |
| Well... Western "knowledge" and "common sense" promoted by those in control... Google? Wiki? African, American, Oceanic people's knowledge is either ignored, discounted or non-existent to Western-Eastern researchers. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
Happy 3rd Anniversary! 
I'm coming up on my first... Almost out of diapers! J
Happy 3rd WdC Anniversary! 
Happy WdC Anniversary! 
